|
Credit Counseling Article
Positives and Negatives of Credit Counseling
by Zip E News
Debt management discussion sponsored by
ADS Financial LLC. As
a non traditional method of dealing with debt. ADS is sponsoring
full disclosure of all debt management methods so that a well
informed consumer can make the right choice.
After joining a debt management program (DMP) or
debt consolidation program, creditors will close the customer's
accounts and restrict the accounts to future charges. The most
common benefit of a DMP as advertised by most agencies is the
consolidation of multiple monthly payments into one monthly payment,
which is usually less than the sum of the individual payments
previously paid by the customer. This is because credit cards banks
will usually accept a lower monthly payment from a customer in a DMP
than if the customer were paying the account on
their own. Some DMP’s advertise that payments can be cut by
50% (These claims are usual to debt settlement companies), although
a reduction of 10-20% is more common.
The second feature of a DMP is a reduction in
interest rates charged by creditors. A customer with a defaulted
credit card account will often be paying an interest rate
approaching 25%. Upon joining a DMP, credit card banks sometimes
lower the annual percentage rates charged to 5-10%, and a few
eliminate interest altogether. This reduction in interest allows the
counseling agencies to advertise that their customers will be debt
free in periods of 3-6 years, rather than the 20+ years that it
would take to pay off a large amount of debt at high interest rates.
This is the debt cycle that ADS Financial tries to break through its
membership oriented debt settlement web site.
A third benefit offered by credit counseling
agencies is the process of bringing delinquent accounts current.
This is often called "re-aging" or "curing" an account. This usually
occurs after making a series of on-time payments through the debt
management program as a show of good faith and commitment to
completion of the program. For example, a client with an account
with a monthly payment of $50 which has not been paid in two months
might be considered by the creditor to be 60 days past due. After
joining the DMP and making three consecutive monthly payments, the
creditor could re-age the account to reflect a current status.
Thereafter the monthly payment due on the statements would be the
monthly payment negotiated by the DMP, and the account report as
current to the credit bureaus. It should be noted that this process
does not eliminate the prior delinquencies from the credit bureau
reports. It merely gives a fresh start and an opportunity for the
client to being building a positive credit history. Like all
derogatory credit information, the passage of time will lessen the
impact of the negative marks when credit scores are calculated.
History of Credit
Counseling
The first credit counseling agencies were created
in 1951 in the United States when credit grantors created The
National Foundation for Credit Counseling, or NFCC. Their stated
objective was to promote financial literacy and help consumers avoid
bankruptcy.
In 1993, the “Association of Independent Consumer
Credit Counseling Agencies,” or AICCCA, was founded, citing a need
for “industry-wide standards of excellence and ethical conduct.”
This formally organized the NFCC’s competition. The AICCCA was
formed from the group of counselors who favored telephone delivery
of debt management programs. The NFCC was, in the beginning,
strongly opposed to this telephone business model, primarily
favoring face-to-face counseling as a more effective solution.
Eventually, all organizations practiced both phone and face-to-face
processes with some agencies using large inbound call centers driven
by mass media advertising.
The credit counseling industry’s third major
trade organization is its largest: the American Association of Debt
Management Organizations, or AADMO.
However, not all credit counseling agencies
belong to a trade organization, nor are they required to do so;
there are well over 1,000 active credit counseling organizations in
the United States.
In 2005, the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and
Consumer Protection Act of 2005 made credit counseling a requirement
for consumer debtors filing for Bankruptcy in the United States. In
order to meet this requirement, during the 180-day period preceding
the filing of bankruptcy, the debtor must complete a program with an
approved nonprofit budget and credit counseling agency. Such a
program may include, but is not limited to, one counseling session
conducted by phone or over the internet. In addition, a post-filing
debtor education credit counseling session is required in order to
complete the bankruptcy process and to have your debts discharged.
Credit Counseling is also a growing industry in
Europe, both for profit-making debt management companies and
charities such as Christians Against Poverty and the Consumer Credit
Counseling Service, Britain's largest debt advice charity.
Criticism of Credit
Counseling
In the late 1980s and early 1990s, the number of
credit and debt counseling agencies in America increased
significantly. An antitrust lawsuit was filed against the NFCC,
arguing that the presence of creditors on the NFCC’s Board of
Directors constituted monopolistic practices. As a result of this
litigation, creditors agreed to fund non-NFCC member agencies as
well.
These sharp increases of credit counseling
activity also created other, more serious issues in the industry. By
the early 1990s, abuses by certain credit counseling organizations
were so significant, it led to criticism of the entire industry.
A credit counseling agency typically receives
most of its compensation from the creditors to whom the debt
payments are distributed. This funding relationship has led many to
believe that credit counseling agencies are merely a collections
wing of the creditors. This fee income, known as “Fair Share,” are
contributions from the creditors that originally earned the agency
15% of the amount recovered. However, in recent years, Fair Share
contributions have dwindled steadily, with contributions of 4-10%
being the most common.
Still the NFCC considers bankcard companies to be
one of their primary "constituents," and the NFCC website promotes
the fact that they collect $5 billion for creditors each year. It
also promotes their efforts to steer consumers away from bankruptcy.
ADS
Financial LLC. works with the consumer to remove credit card
debt by charging a small membership fee. The threat of bankruptcy is
used to negotiate reductions in debt with credit card companies.
Since bankruptcy can eliminate credit card debt, this fact makes
debt settlement a viable alternative.
The Federal Trade Commission has filed lawsuits
against several credit counseling agencies, and continues to urge
caution in choosing a credit counseling agency. The FTC has received
more than 8,000 complaints from consumers about credit counselors,
many concerning high or hidden fees and the inability to opt out of
so-called “voluntary” contributions. The Better Business Bureau also
reports high complaint levels about credit counseling.
The IRS also has weighed in on the subject of
credit counseling, and has denied nonprofit 501(c)(3) tax-exempt
status to around 30 of the nation's 1000 credit counseling agencies.
Those 30 credit counseling agencies account for more than half of
the industry's revenue. Audits of non-profit credit counseling
agencies by the IRS are ongoing.
The lobby against credit counselors arises from
the belief by the collection industry that the not-for-profit status
of the credit counselors gives them an unfair financial and market
advantage over them. The IRS apparently agrees. The tax exempt
revocations seem to be centered around whether a tax exempt credit
counselor actually performed their mandated mission by assisting the
community at large, other than their whole attention to their own
DMP customers in a "collection practice" (no one knows for sure
however).
Congress has also investigated the credit
counseling industry, and issued a report that said while some
agencies are ethical, others charge excessive fees and provide poor
service to consumers. The report also stated that NFCC member
guidelines, if applied to the entire credit counseling industry,
would go a long way toward eliminating the abuses they uncovered in
some parts of the industry.
Other organizations have voiced criticisms of the
credit counseling industry, often citing the Fair Share funding
model as evidence that credit counselors serve the interests of the
creditors over the interests of consumers, and that credit
counselors are not forthcoming in speaking out about the actions of
creditors for fear of losing what little funding remains. Credit
counselors respond that their job is not to take sides but to
negotiate with all parties equally to help successfully resolve
debts. They further argue that the steady decline in Fair Share
funding belies the notion that creditors are in control of the
credit counseling industry.
Another common criticism of credit counseling is
the assertion that participating in a Debt Management Plan will ruin
a consumer’s credit. Fair Isaac Corporation, the company that
pioneered the use of credit scores, states that participation in a
Debt Management Plan has no effect on a consumer's FICO credit
score. However, the participation in such a plan does appear on
consumer credit reports, and the client may have more difficulty
securing a car or home loan and be denied any further unsecured
credit, such as a credit card. Some lenders view a prospective
customer's participation in a Debt Management Plan as indicative of
the customer being unfit to manage their finances.
Counseling agencies have also been criticized for
understating their clients' future responsibilities during the
initial enrollment process. Agencies have been accused of telling
clients to stop paying creditors directly and cease all telephone
contact with creditors. This can result in accounts falling past due
during the period that the client transitions into the DMP. Many
clients come to the DMP with current accounts; they are simply
seeking lower interest rates rather needing help bringing their
accounts current. It takes the average DMP 1-2 months to start
making disbursements to creditors, during which time the accounts
will fall past due if the client does not continue making direct
payments to the creditors. Often this is impossible, however,
because the client cannot afford to pay the DMP an advance payment
as well as pay the creditors the normal monthly payment amounts. In
this way a client's credit can be damaged as the accounts
unintentionally fall past due.
Given this criticism, the industry is likely to
be changed forever in the immediate future as it is scrutinized by
both the consumer and government regulators over how they will be
paid for the services they perform. In meantime, there will be no
shortage of debt-burdened consumers who will now be facing a
burgeoning, and more traditional, collection industry.
It should also be noted that many credit
counseling services employ people hired off the street who are then
trained in credit counseling. Thus the person helping you may not
have any formal training in financial management other than what
they received when they got hired as a credit counselor. This
training is usually minimal and focused only on the services
provided rather than a full course on financial management.
|